Be the first to know: SUBSCRIBE HERE
↑ To add this ANIMATOR CLICK HERE
Greater Orange HEADLINES in the News
Follow Greater Orange on TWITTER
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
OUSD to reveal Measure K plans
ORANGE Unified Schools INSIDE
Independent
insight into OUSD
a news service of
Orange
Net News
/O/N/N/
As Christensen and Pauly spar in the
press...
Measure K architectural plans
take center stage at the OUSD Special Board Meeting Thursday Oct 2nd
The
Orange Unified School Board will hold a Special Meeting Thursday October 2nd to
review the newest architectural plans prepared for the four high schools. Unlike the earlier artist renderings of high
schools plans using a wish list of community stakeholders of each of the sites,
the newest renderings will take into account the Measure K budget of $74
million allotted to each of OUSD's comprehensive high schools.
In
August of this year the OUSD Board authorized each of the master plan
architectural firms ( one for each high school) to develop the drawings of what
could be accomplished at each of the high schools with the funding from Measure
K with the emphasis on educationally related modernization.
In
June, OUSD Trustee Dr. Alexia Deligianni cited the original renderings as one
of her reasons she voted against placing Measure K on the November ballot. Deligianni not only voted against placing the
Bond on the ballot, she also joined with Measure K opponents led by Villa Park
Councilwomen Deborah Pauly in signing the ballot argument against Measure K.
In
the September issue of the Foothills
Sentry Pauly pens a "Guest Editorial" against Measure K. While Pauly writes in the editorial that the
OUSD buildings have " a real need
for refurbishing and modernization"
she falsely blames that need on "OUSD
placing a low priority" on modernization. The controversial Pauly overlooks the truth
of OUSD being the only district in Orange County
that has successfully modernized a handful of its 40 schools (including two of
its five middle schools) in the last decade without having a bond. For those schools, OUSD had the option for
using matching state funding. That effort to update schools in a piecemeal
fashion ended with the state budget crisis that resulted from the Great
Recession. What remains true is that OUSD is the only major district in Orange County
that has not passed a bond measure to update schools-causing student flight from
local schools and declining property values across Greater Orange despite the high
quality of education in OUSD schools.
Pauly
too takes aim at the stakeholder planning that involved each of the high
school's own communities in an in-depth study of the high schools. In
the editorial Pauly ( who is not an attorney) also criticizes the legal wording required in the Measure K ballot
description as "copy and paste".
She further criticizes the community stakeholders assessment of their schools as
"disconnect between 'needs' and
'wants'" while she acknowledges that the stakeholders were
specifically told to look at their schools without limits. Community members dreaming
big about what 21st education looks like to the community apparently makes Pauly
uncomfortable enough to call for Measure K's defeat. Or is it something else
that Pauly isn't forthcoming about?
In
the same Foothills Sentry issue, in
the Letters to the Editor section,
OUSD Superintendent Michael Christensen defends the process OUSD took writing
that "I would like to take this
opportunity to clarify some misinformation circulating about the ongoing OUSD High
School Facilities Master Plan/Measure K Bond
process". Christensen goes on
to write about the very open and transparent collaborative process the
community stakeholders at each of the high schools engaged in to produce not
only plans for updated educational facilities, but also for community specific library,
athletic and other student centered facilities needs. Christensen writes the resulting Master Plans
are "visioning documents that take
into account each school community".
The Superintendent rightfully points out that the "community support was immense"
for the Master Facilities Plans process, but he also acknowledges the concerns
of some community members about the "overall
costs of implementing such grand plans". He goes on to explain the
OUSD Board did polling of the community at large to find what price the voters
in the community would be comfortable in supporting for the modernization of
their high schools. He writes that the poll reported that the community would
support a $39 per $100,000 of assessed value.
His letter also states that the OUSD Board had authorized the
architectural firms to draw up plans based on the Measure K budget of a projected $74 million for each of the high
schools so the community will be fully
informed of the plans before the election.
Those plans will be presented Thursday October 2nd.
The
Superintendent also noted that the OUSD Board has authorized setting aside
double the current maintenance budget to maintain the high schools. Critics like Pauly have called that figure
low-despite the fact that it doubles the budget that has maintained the current
schools as operational for well past their projected lifetime.
What
the Superintendent's letter does not address is the bang-for-the-buck return
the Greater Orange property owners will reap in property values and equity
should Measure K pass. That simple message on property values is what the Measure K proponents have
touted from the beginning as they have amassed a coalition of supporters that
has crossed demographic, social and political lines.
NEXT OUSD BOARD MEETING Thursday October
2, 2014
OPEN SESSION ONLY NOTE Time change 6:00 pm
CLICK ON: AGENDA
For more information call the OUSD
Superintendent’s office at 714-628-4040
For budgeting questions call Business Services at
714-628-4015
ARCHIVAL Information and direct news can be found
at:
the Greater Orange News Service
http://greaterorange.blogspot.com/
ORANGE
Unified Schools INSIDE
and the
Greater Orange News Service
are independent news services of /O/N/N/
Orange
Net News
Comments:
<< Home
Thank you for explaining the timeline of events. Now it makes sense and I am looking forward to seeing exactly what Measure K is going to get us. It is time to invest in our schools - they are old - all the maintenance in the world does not change that. I would think after 50 years of use, any fair-minded and reasonable person would see that it is a rational investment to bring these schools into the 21st century. But then again, rational and reasonable aren't the first words that come to mind when one thinks of the self-centered politicians arguing against Measure K.
Thank you for pointing out that Measure K has in fact been endorsed by leaders and community members that span the political spectrum. These are people that care about our kids receiving a quality education in safe and modern learning environments. They also recognize that when we have improved school facilities, we will enjoy increased property values.
Our ballot argument alone is signed by:
Orange County Supervisor Todd Spitzer
Former Orange County Supervisor and US Ambassador (Ret) Gaddi Vasquez
Chapman University President James Doti
Former OUSD Trustee Melissa Smith
We have many more endorsers which will soon be listed on www.MeasureK.org and will be featured in our mailers.
Unlike the opposition, our growing list of people endorsing Measure K either live in our community, serve or have served this community as volunteers/elected officials, they know our community, some have kids in our schools and/or graduated from our high schools. These are people invested in our community and they realize after more and less than a HALF A CENTURY, it is time to step up and step into the 21st Century.
Kris Erickson
Co-Chair CARE
Yes on Measure K
Post a Comment
Our ballot argument alone is signed by:
Orange County Supervisor Todd Spitzer
Former Orange County Supervisor and US Ambassador (Ret) Gaddi Vasquez
Chapman University President James Doti
Former OUSD Trustee Melissa Smith
We have many more endorsers which will soon be listed on www.MeasureK.org and will be featured in our mailers.
Unlike the opposition, our growing list of people endorsing Measure K either live in our community, serve or have served this community as volunteers/elected officials, they know our community, some have kids in our schools and/or graduated from our high schools. These are people invested in our community and they realize after more and less than a HALF A CENTURY, it is time to step up and step into the 21st Century.
Kris Erickson
Co-Chair CARE
Yes on Measure K
<< Home